China-US trade deal: Neutral impact on Taiwan

The US and China formally signed the phase 1 trade deal on January 16. The impact of this deal on Taiwan is expected to be neutral.
Ma Tie Ying17 Jan 2020
  • The squeezing impact on Taiwan, as a result of China’s increase of imports from the US…
  • … and opening of its financial services sector to the US, should be small and limited
  • The risk of supply chain disruption as a result of a tech war has not fully subsided
  • Supply chain diversification by Taiwanese tech firms is likely to continue
Photo credit: AFP Photo

The US and China formally signed the phase 1 trade deal in Washington on January 16. The agreement includes chapters on intellectual property, technology transfer, agricultural trade, financial services, currency, trade expansion, and dispute resolution.

China’s import increase from the US

China has committed to increase its imports from the US by a total of USD200bn over the next two years, on top of the 2017 baseline levels (about USD 210bn). This would imply additional purchase of agricultural, energy, manufacturing goods, and services worth USD32bn, USD52.4bn, USD77.7bn, and USD37.9bn, respectively.

A sharp rise in China’s imports from the US would squeeze its other trade partners, but the impact on Taiwan should be limited, in our view. The overlap of the US and Taiwan’s export structure is low. China’s imports from Taiwan are largely concentrated in electrical machinery and equipment (63% of total goods imports). In contrast, China’s imports from the US are equally comprised of agricultural goods (14%), transport equipment (19%), and electrical machinery (12%). Moreover, China’s imports from Taiwan are partly driven by the intra-company supplies, i.e., the purchase of semiconductors and other components by the Taiwanese tech firms based on the mainland from their parent companies. Substitution of these products should be unlikely.

Opening of financial services sector

China has also agreed in the phase 1 trade deal to further open its financial services sector to the American firms, including in banking, securities, insurance, asset management, and credit rating services. By April 1, China will eliminate the foreign equity caps for American securities companies, life/health/pension insurance companies, fund management companies, and futures companies.

Likewise, the squeezing impact on Taiwanese financial institutions should be small. The Taiwanese financial institutions operating in the Chinese market currently focus on providing the corporate banking services for the Taiwanese firms based on the mainland. Direct competition with the American counterparts is limited. Meanwhile, China has been accelerating the process of opening its financial services sector to all foreign investors. Earlier last year, it has already announced to abolish the foreign ownership caps on securities, life insurance, fund management and futures companies, starting from 2020.

Intellectual property and technology transfer

The two countries have also reached agreement on intellectual property and technology transfer, involving issues surrounding trade secrets, patents, trademarks, piracy/counterfeiting, forced technology transfer, and state-directed outbound investment aimed at acquiring foreign technology. The thorny issues involving data flows and cybersecurity will be left to the next phase of negotiations. Also note that lifting the trade ban on China’s tech giant Huawei is not part of the phase 1 trade deal. Reuters reported this week that the US government would still push for a rule that expands its power to block the sales of foreign-made goods to Huawei.

The risk of supply chain disruption as a result of a tech war has not fully subsided despite the phase 1 trade deal. From a long-term perspective, Taiwanese tech firms would still find it necessary to shift the technology sensitive production outside of China and to diversify their supply chains.


On the currency issues, the phase 1 trade deal includes commitments to refrain from competitive devaluation and targeting of exchange rates, while increasing transparency on data disclosure (e.g., foreign reserves and forward positions, balance of payments). No quantitative targets have been set in this regard.

The tariff rollback accompanying the phase 1 trade deal does not justify a strong appreciation of the CNY. The US has agreed to cut the tariffs on USD120bn Chinese goods (which took effect in Sep19) to 7.5% from 15%. The existing 25% duties on USD250bn Chinese exports will stay in place, however, pending negotiations on the phase 2 trade deal. As such, the weighted average tariff rate imposed by the US on Chinese exports will fall only slightly, to about 13.5% from 15.2%.

On the flip side, a sharp rise in China’s imports from the US could result in a weakening of its current account balance, which in turn, exerts depreciation pressure on the CNY. The overall impact of the phase 1 trade deal on the CNY (and thus other emerging Asian currencies) may not be directional or substantial, in our view.

To read the full report, click here to Download the PDF.

Ma Tieying

Economist - Japan, South Korea, & Taiwan

The information herein is published by DBS Bank Ltd and PT Bank DBS Indonesia (collectively, the “DBS Group”). It is based on information obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but the Group does not make any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to its accuracy, completeness, timeliness or correctness for any particular purpose. Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. Any recommendation contained herein does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation & the particular needs of any specific addressee. The information herein is published for the information of addressees only & is not to be taken in substitution for the exercise of judgement by addressees, who should obtain separate legal or financial advice. The Group, or any of its related companies or any individuals connected with the group accepts no liability for any direct, special, indirect, consequential, incidental damages or any other loss or damages of any kind arising from any use of the information herein (including any error, omission or misstatement herein, negligent or otherwise) or further communication thereof, even if the Group or any other person has been advised of the possibility thereof. The information herein is not to be construed as an offer or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities, futures, options or other financial instruments or to provide any investment advice or services. The Group & its associates, their directors, officers and/or employees may have positions or other interests in, & may effect transactions in securities mentioned herein & may also perform or seek to perform broking, investment banking & other banking or finan­cial services for these companies. The information herein is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to law or regulation. Sources for all charts & tables are CEIC & Bloomberg unless otherwise specified.

DBS Bank Ltd., 12 Marina Blvd, Marina Bay Financial Center Tower 3, Singapore 018982. Tel: 65-6878-8888. Company Registration No. 196800306E. DBS Bank Ltd., Hong Kong Branch, a company incorporated in Singapore with limited liability. 18th Floor, The Center, 99 Queen’s Road Central, Central, Hong Kong.

PT Bank DBS Indonesia, DBS Bank Tower, 33rd floor, Ciputra World 1, Jalan Prof. Dr. Satrio Kav 3-5, Jakarta, 12940, Indonesia. Tel: 62-21-2988-4000. Company Registration No.