South Korea & Taiwan: lower inflation, stable rates


Given the strong momentum of disinflation, we have lowered South Korea’s CPI forecast to 1.1% for 2019 and 1.5% for 2020. Taiwan’s forecast has also been trimmed to 0.7% for 2019.
Ma Tieying05 Mar 2019
  • Our numbers have considered a moderate rebound in oil prices to US$70-75/bbl in 2H19 …
  • … normalisation in food prices, and hikes in minimum wages
  • We maintain the view for the short-term KRW and TWD rates to stay stable in 2019-20
Photo credit: AFP Photo


Trimming inflation forecasts

Inflation is easing faster than expected in South Korea and Taiwan. Headline CPI in South Korea registered an average of 0.6% YoY in January-February, sharply lower than the 1.8% in 4Q18. In Taiwan, headline CPI also dropped notably to 0.2% in January, down from 0.5% in 4Q18 and 1.7% in 3Q18. The strong momentum of disinflation necessitates a downward revision in the annual CPI forecasts. We have revised down South Korea’s inflation forecast to 1.1% from 1.7% for 2019, and to 1.5% from 1.6% for 2020. Taiwan’s inflation forecast has been trimmed to 0.7% from 1.0% for 2019, while kept unchanged at 1.0% for 2020.

Admittedly, oil prices have started to rebound more recently, thanks to the recovery in global risk appetite, policy stimulus out of China, and optimism about US-China trade negotiations. A further rise appears likely in the coming months, given that OPEC countries have started to cut back oil production and the US’s waiver on Iran sanctions will expire by end-April. We currently forecast the Brent crude oil prices (USD/bbl) to average mid-60s in 1H19 and rise towards the USD70-75 range in 2H19. Nonetheless, this implies that the full-year energy inflation will be about 0% YoY in 2019.

The underlying core inflation is also likely to be muted this year. Despite the government’s push for minimum wage hikes in South Korea and Taiwan, the passthrough onto consumer prices is expected to be minimal. This considers the ongoing slowdown in GDP growth, deterioration in output gap and subdued inflation expectations. The corporate sector in South Korea and Taiwan are more likely to absorb the increase in wage costs (e.g., scaling back hiring plans, shifting to part-time workforce) than to raise the selling prices, in our view.

Uncertainties will mainly come from the volatile food components in the CPI basket. Food prices in South Korea surged as much as 7-8% in 2010-11, due to the serious outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease and the resultant shortage of meat/dairy supply. This year, the country temporarily raised alert on FMD in January. In Taiwan, food prices tend to be boosted by the summer typhoons due to the disruption on vegetable and fruit supply (e.g., 4-5% rise in food prices in 2012 and 2016). Under our baseline scenario, we expect food inflation to stay at the long-term normal levels this year, at a circa 4% in South Korea and 2% in Taiwan. This implies a moderate pickup from last year’s 2.9% and 1.0%, respectively.

Rate cuts remain unlikely

On surface, CPI inflation has fallen well below the benchmark interest rate in South Korea and Taiwan, opening the door for potential rate cuts. But we doubt that the two central banks will pursue such moves anytime soon. Our forecast remains for the Bank of Korea (BOK) to keep the 7-day repo rate unchanged at 1.75% through 2019-20, and for Taiwan’s central bank (CBC) to hold the discount rate at 1.375% in 2019-20.

The BOK has said explicitly at the latest policy meeting in February that it is not considering a rate cut for the time being. In fact, the BOK just raised rates by 25bps four months ago in Nov18 to address the side-effects of the persistently accommodative monetary policy, such as the rise in property prices, expansion in household debt and deterioration in financial imbalance. Historically, the BOK shifted from rate hikes to rate cuts within 12 months only when economic shocks occurred and recession risks increased substantially. These include the periods during the global tech bubble burst in 2001, SARS outbreak in 2003, and global financial crisis in 2008. Back then, GDP growth contracted on the QoQ basis for one quarter (-3.0% in 4Q00, -2.7% in 1Q03, -12.7% in 4Q08). The current macro environment does not justify such a drastic policy U-turn, in our view.

The CBC has also maintained a neutral policy as of the latest meeting in Dec18. Excess liquidity, narrow interest margin and intense competition among the banking sector are long-standing problems in Taiwan. The amount of excess reserves held by financial institutions, for instance, has risen steadily after the 2008 GFC and is now equivalent to two times of the long-term average. Prior to the recent economic slowdown, the bias was for the CBC to normalise interest rates and mop up liquidity. In fact, during the past two decades, the CBC moved to cut rates only when recession happened and monetary stimulus was strongly required. These include the 2001 tech bubble burst, 2008 GFC, and 2015 technical recession, when GDP growth went negative on the QoQ basis for at least two quarters. Barring a recession this year, the CBC may not rush to slash rates, in our view.

To read the full report, click here to Download the PDF.

Ma Tieying

Economist - Japan, South Korea, & Taiwan
matieying@dbs.com
 
 

The information herein is published by DBS Bank Ltd and PT Bank DBS Indonesia (collectively, the “DBS Group”). It is based on information obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but the Group does not make any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to its accuracy, completeness, timeliness or correctness for any particular purpose. Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. Any recommendation contained herein does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation & the particular needs of any specific addressee. The information herein is published for the information of addressees only & is not to be taken in substitution for the exercise of judgement by addressees, who should obtain separate legal or financial advice. The Group, or any of its related companies or any individuals connected with the group accepts no liability for any direct, special, indirect, consequential, incidental damages or any other loss or damages of any kind arising from any use of the information herein (including any error, omission or misstatement herein, negligent or otherwise) or further communication thereof, even if the Group or any other person has been advised of the possibility thereof. The information herein is not to be construed as an offer or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities, futures, options or other financial instruments or to provide any investment advice or services. The Group & its associates, their directors, officers and/or employees may have positions or other interests in, & may effect transactions in securities mentioned herein & may also perform or seek to perform broking, investment banking & other banking or finan­cial services for these companies. The information herein is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to law or regulation. Sources for all charts & tables are CEIC & Bloomberg unless otherwise specified.

DBS Bank Ltd., 12 Marina Blvd, Marina Bay Financial Center Tower 3, Singapore 018982. Tel: 65-6878-8888. Company Registration No. 196800306E.

PT Bank DBS Indonesia, DBS Bank Tower, 33rd floor, Ciputra World 1, Jalan Prof. Dr. Satrio Kav 3-5, Jakarta, 12940, Indonesia. Tel: 62-21-2988-4000. Company Registration No. 09.03.1.64.96422.