India: How many policy rate cuts are left?


With the policy rate now at the lowest since 2010, questions are arising on how low it can go?
Radhika Rao01 Oct 2019
  • With the policy rate at the lowest since 2010, how low can it go?
  • Depending on growth and inflation, there is room for 10-60bps cuts in 2020
  • Fiscal stance and global developments will be factored in
  • The 2HFY20 borrowing schedule has been maintained
Photo credit: AFP Photo


The Reserve Bank of India has front run the regional central banks with a cumulative 110bps cuts in the repo in 2019. A favourable inflation profile and weakness in growth indicators necessitated an accommodative policy stance. With the policy rate now at the lowest since 2010, questions are arising on how low it can go?

A rate cut is likely at this week’s policy meet

The RBI monetary policy committee (MPC) meets this week to decide on rates. 2Q (1QFY20) growth numbers released after the August rate decision, disappointed as the actual outcome undershot official projections by ~80bps. This will lead to a downward revision in the central bank’s official GDP projections, which pegged full-year growth at 6.9% (vs market at 5.8-6.5%).



Inflation has stayed below target, with a sharp cut in corporate tax rates while positive for growth, has increased fiscal slippage risks at the margin. Of the 40bps cut we expect in this quarter, half is likely this week, also noting the significant variation in market estimates from 5.15% to 5%. This cut, in our view, will reflect the RBI’s decision to take the middle path – be growth-oriented with an accommodative stance, but also reserve some firepower as fiscal purse strings are being loosened concurrently. A dovish bias will also help undo the rise in bond yields witnessed post-tax cuts, particularly in the short end of the curve. We expect a similar-sized cut in December taking the repo rate to 5% by end-2019. A decision by the MPC to, instead, frontload the cumulative 40bps cut this week will not surprise either.

Where to next?

Assuming our rate call for 4Q19 plays out, the repo rate will stand at 5% by end-December 2019. Where to next?

Basis few assumptions, we highlight how far we are from levels considered as a terminal rate. We use the Taylor’s rule as a thumb rule to estimate the approximate room for further cuts given prevailing and one-year hence, growth and inflation levels. These calculations are sensitive to the assumption of the real interest rate, which will be a ‘constant’ variable.

In the past, Indian policymakers maintained high real interest rates to ensure financial stability and keep deposit returns attractive. This is, however, being questioned considering a sliding savings rate in the past 5-6 years and studies suggesting that real incomes rather than interest rates have been a more important driver for higher savings.

With insufficient clarity on the RBI’s preferred real interest rate gauge, we assume the lower end of the previously suggested range of 1.25-1.75% i.e. 1.25% as the desired real interest rate level.

We highlight our assumptions under four scenarios - a) Sub-4% inflation: recovery in growth – Over the next four quarters starting 4Q19, we assume inflation below target at 3.8% and growth at 6.9% (starting 4Q19), which leaves the output gap at ~10bps. Factoring in these and our choice of real interest rate quantum, points to a terminal policy rate of 4.9%, which leaves room for a modest 10bps cut in 2020; b) sub-4% inflation: Moderate growth – Over the next four quarters starting 4Q19, we assume inflation below target at 3.8% and growth at 6.5%, which leaves the output gap at ~30bps. Factoring in these and our choice of real interest rate quantum, points to a terminal policy rate of 4.7%, which leaves room for a 30bps cut in 2020. c) sub-4% inflation: Low growth – Over the next four quarters starting 4Q19, we assume inflation below target at 3.8% and growth at 6%. Factoring in these and our choice of real interest rate quantum, points to a terminal policy rate of 4.4%, which leaves room for a 60bps further easing in 2020. d) above target inflation: moderate growth –a sharp jump in inflation past 4% in 1H20 leaves no room to ease rates further. Given evolving price trends, odds of this scenario is low.

Our base case is closer to b) where we expect growth to gradually shift back towards 6% in the second half of FY20 and maintain the pace heading into FY21. Our forecast for inflation over the time horizon reflects few months of 4%+ inflation and then heading down into FY21 as base effects again turn favourable. Hence, we continue to watch the RBI MPC’s leaning to add to our current forecast of the repo rate at 5% by December 2019.

Apart from purely macro assumptions, the role of the government’s fiscal stance (to a greater extent) and global developments (at the margin) will also influence the central bank’s policy path. In recent weeks, the government has warmed up to fiscal stimulus, with an eye on spurring investments and industrial growth. If this persists and the stimulus steers clear of directly boosting consumption, we expect the RBI to cut rates, albeit, gradually. A clear shift towards consumption stimulus, however, might but the RBI on the defensive. By most measures (except the bearish assumption), beyond December 2019, we are about 2-3 rate cuts from reaching the terminal policy level.

Liquidity framework – minor tweaks, largely status quo

Separately, the RBI issued the draft report for liquidity management framework last week. Key proposals by the panel were –

a) The current system of ‘corridor’ around the repo rate will continue, retaining present spreads

b) Call money rate i.e. Weighted Average Call Rate (WACR) to continue as the target rate and stay close to the repo rate

c) Systemic liquidity will be targeted to stay at deficit around 0.25-0.5% of Net Demand and Time Liabilities (NDTL); this translates to a deficit of ~INR250-500bn

d) Recommended tools –
i) Deficits to be offset by liquidity-injection measures (such as OMO purchases or buy-sell FX swaps)
ii) Persistent surplus to be neutralised by durable liquidity-absorbing operations (such as OMO sales or sell-buy FX swaps).

e) As an alternative to OMO purchases, longer-term variable rate repos, longer than 14 days and up to one-year tenor, be considered as a new tool for liquidity injection if system liquidity is in a large deficit.

We make a few observations following the report. Firstly, there were no large departures in the liquidity framework from the current system. This runs parallel to RBI Governor Das comments in June where he expressed the need for a change.

Secondly, market participants had expected the liquidity stance to be in cohesion with the monetary policy stance – i.e. a rate-cutting cycle to be accompanied by surplus liquidity which will ensure timely and effective transmission. The report instead, suggests that a shift to a surplus balance will occur when deemed necessary and if warranted by financial conditions, rather than policy stance.



Third, in the current circumstances, we reckon that financial conditions will be considered as tight given sticky borrowing costs for non-banks and other credit-deficient segments. This backs the case for surplus liquidity (has been the case since June) to be maintained to ensure rate cuts percolate through the system. While GST and tax related outflows might cause temporary swings, we expect the unstated bias to stay towards keep financial conditions accommodative. Finally, the use of variable term operations rather than OMOs will squash expectations of further support for bonds. Nonetheless, the larger aim to ensure transmission and keep yields low, we reckon will keep the OMO option on the table, particularly during adverse rate movements.

Market implications

For the markets, steepening bias for the INR sovereign bond curve will continue. The short-end of the curve is held down by rate cut expectations, but longer-end faces bouts of fiscal-related concerns.

Short-term wariness was allayed after the 2HFY20 borrowing plan was maintained with a gross issuance of INR2.7trn – i.e. 38% of the full-year target. The nitty-gritties involve – auctions to be spread over 17 weeks and will conclude by late-January, instead of running until early-March as in the past. 60% of the issuance will be in the 5Y to 14Y bucket, heavier at the higher end of the duration. Less than 5Y at ~7% of total.

An unchanged borrowing schedule provides temporary relief to the markets. Monthly fiscal math will be watched for direct and indirect tax revenue trends which will become clearer in 4Q19 and dictate the need for a wider fiscal deficit. Apart from tax revenues, the math might require renewed push towards disinvestment, other support (dividend payout, subsidy rollovers etc) and expenditure curtailment. Prima facie, we see risks of a miss to the FY20 fiscal deficit target to -3.5-3.6% of GDP vs budgeted -3.3%. Reliance will be on the INR debt markets, as the maiden offshore bond issuance has been ruled out this year.




A silver lining for the debt markets is a signal that the authorities are seeking the inclusion of Indian papers into the key global bond indices, over the next two years. The FPI investment limit into government securities might be raised as a precursor. Bloomberg LP has reportedly offered to assist the authorities to navigate the process for gaining such inclusion. Being a part of such will help not only draw the interest of not only active funds, but also passive players who are mandated to track and allocate monies according to the benchmark indices. FPI limit in government securities stands to rise to 6% of outstanding bonds by 2020, 2% for state debt and 9% for corporate bonds.

As of 30Sep, about 70% of the limit into government securities has been utilised (see table below).



Current account balance at manageable levels

The 2Q current account deficit widened to USD14bn i.e. 2% of GDP from USD4.6bn in 1Q (0.7% of GDP). A wider trade deficit accounted for bulk of this larger gap, also tracking seasonal patterns. Service balance eased marginally, while remittances improved in the quarter. Stronger capital inflows helped lift the 2Q balance of payments to surplus. Looking ahead for rest of FY20, the trade deficit while stable is at elevated levels, while service sector earnings improve. Netting of the two the FY20 current account deficit is likely to average -1.9% of GDP.


To read the full report, click here to Download the PDF.


Radhika Rao

Economist – India, Thailand & Eurozone
radhikarao@dbs.com

The information herein is published by DBS Bank Ltd and PT Bank DBS Indonesia (collectively, the “DBS Group”). It is based on information obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but the Group does not make any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to its accuracy, completeness, timeliness or correctness for any particular purpose. Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice. Any recommendation contained herein does not have regard to the specific investment objectives, financial situation & the particular needs of any specific addressee. The information herein is published for the information of addressees only & is not to be taken in substitution for the exercise of judgement by addressees, who should obtain separate legal or financial advice. The Group, or any of its related companies or any individuals connected with the group accepts no liability for any direct, special, indirect, consequential, incidental damages or any other loss or damages of any kind arising from any use of the information herein (including any error, omission or misstatement herein, negligent or otherwise) or further communication thereof, even if the Group or any other person has been advised of the possibility thereof. The information herein is not to be construed as an offer or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities, futures, options or other financial instruments or to provide any investment advice or services. The Group & its associates, their directors, officers and/or employees may have positions or other interests in, & may effect transactions in securities mentioned herein & may also perform or seek to perform broking, investment banking & other banking or finan­cial services for these companies. The information herein is not intended for distribution to, or use by, any person or entity in any jurisdiction or country where such distribution or use would be contrary to law or regulation. Sources for all charts & tables are CEIC & Bloomberg unless otherwise specified.

DBS Bank Ltd., 12 Marina Blvd, Marina Bay Financial Center Tower 3, Singapore 018982. Tel: 65-6878-8888. Company Registration No. 196800306E.

PT Bank DBS Indonesia, DBS Bank Tower, 33rd floor, Ciputra World 1, Jalan Prof. Dr. Satrio Kav 3-5, Jakarta, 12940, Indonesia. Tel: 62-21-2988-4000. Company Registration No. 09.03.1.64.96422.